“欢乐春节”亮相多国 文化年货慰乡愁促交流******
中新网北京2月1日电 题:“欢乐春节”亮相多国 文化年货慰乡愁促交流
中新网记者 吴侃
融汇中西的新春音乐会、欢乐喜庆的春节巡游、热闹非凡的新春庙会......2023年春节期间,由中国文化和旅游部主办的“欢乐春节”活动在多国举行。这些“文化年货”形式多样、丰富多彩,慰藉了海外游子的思乡之情,也让世界各地的民众“沉浸式”体验热闹的中国年。
华侨华人同庆欢乐春节
大年初一,位于阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯市的国家公园广场上龙腾狮舞、锣鼓喧天,这里举行的是2023年“欢乐春节”新春庙会。表演者们带来了太极剑、古筝独奏、现代探戈等精彩表演,当地民众和华侨华人欣赏节目,购买中国传统手工艺品,品尝中国特色小吃。
“对于华侨华人而言,春节年俗是深刻的文化印记。”庙会承办方负责人之一、阿根廷妇女儿童联合会会长陈静说,今年的春节庙会更重视中华传统文化元素的呈现,还有很多华裔青少年登台献艺,充分展现阿根廷华侨华人蓬勃奋进的面貌,也把欢庆中国年的喜悦分享给当地民众。
庙会是中国传统民俗文化活动,也是海外华人庆祝春节必不可少的活动。日前,在俄罗斯莫斯科举行的“欢乐春节——中国文化庙会”现场,投壶、套圈儿、猜谜语等各项小游戏吸引了众多嘉宾驻足,中国书法家还在现场挥毫泼墨,书写“福”字和春联。在丰富多彩的文化体验活动中,大家共同欢庆农历兔年春节。
在匈牙利布达佩斯,2023年“欢乐春节”匈牙利唐人街新春庙会当地时间1月28日举行,现场张灯结彩、喜气洋洋,来宾们学习书法国画,剪窗花、猜灯谜、画脸谱、包饺子、品茗赏茶。匈牙利《新导报》在报道中指出:“庙会持续两天,吸引数万人参与,让来宾们在指尖、笔尖、舌尖感受丰富多彩的中华传统文化。”
多彩活动展现文化魅力
“观众朋友们,我现在在里斯本东方博物馆......”当地时间1月25日,葡萄牙《葡新报》的记者来到2023年葡萄牙“欢乐春节”活动现场做直播,带领观众在音乐和展览中感受葡萄牙的春节氛围。
2023年“欢乐春节”活动在葡萄牙里斯本和波尔图两个城市举办,《葡新报》记者直播了两地的活动。“两场直播活动都在线上引发热烈反响。”葡萄牙《葡新报》的报道指出:“随着华人在葡萄牙影响力与日俱增,春节活动已不再是华人社区内部的自娱自乐,发展为多元文化融合的民间盛会,展现了中华传统文化魅力。”
视频:在美国听唐诗是一种什么体验?纽约林肯中心上演“唐诗的回响”视听盛宴来源:中国新闻网
春节期间,各类音乐会架起沟通的桥梁,使海内外共享中华文化之美。当地时间1月7日晚,2023“欢乐春节”《唐诗的回响》音乐会在纽约林肯中心上演;巴黎中国文化中心当地时间1月25日晚举办2023“欢乐春节”系列活动之“弦音雅韵”音乐会;当地时间1月16日晚,2023年“欢乐春节”庆典音乐会在柏林中国文化中心举行,音乐家们带来了一场中西合璧的视听盛宴。
各族裔共享年味大餐
在加拿大蒙特利尔,第七届欢乐春节庙会当地时间1月28日在唐人街中山公园和文化宫举行,庙会以“振兴华埠迎兔年”为主题,当地华人文艺团体表演了腰鼓、歌舞等节目,华侨华人和当地民众在现场观看中国书画作品展,体验剪窗花、做灯笼等传统技艺。
“蒙特利尔欢乐春节庙会始于2017年,已成为中华传统文化展示和交流的一道靓丽的城市文化风景。”蒙特利尔华商会主席张仕根介绍,在当地逾百个华人社团共同支持和参与下,历届庙会已累计吸引300多万人次的游客前来体验中华民俗风情、共享中国年的喜庆。
当地时间1月14日,2023“欢乐春节”大巡游在阿联酋迪拜举行,60余个方阵、20多辆花车从世博会中国馆出发,喜庆前行。华侨华人商会、在阿中资机构和企业、阿联酋当地企业等组成巡游队伍,奉献舞龙、舞狮、秧歌、伞舞等表演,一辆辆花车五彩缤纷、各具巧思。街边的春节集市上,人们在品尝中华美食、体验非遗手作、挑选中国商品。
阿联酋华星艺术团团长王鸣凤表示,阿联酋华星艺术团组成了腰鼓队方阵,在春节巡游中英姿飒爽,腰鼓队中的成员年龄最小的10岁,年龄最大的72岁。“‘欢乐春节’大巡游不仅是阿联酋华侨华人的一道年味大餐,也是一场当地民众共同参与的文化盛宴,向阿联酋乃至全世界展示了中华传统文化。”(完)
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
(文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() ![]() AG彩票地图 |